Which action would disqualify an LDO or CWO applicant based on their character evaluation?

A court martial conviction is a significant factor in determining an applicant's character and fitness for leadership positions within the military. Such a conviction indicates serious breaches of military law, reflecting negatively on an individual's integrity, judgment, and ability to uphold the standards expected of officers. The military places a high emphasis on the character of its leaders, and a history of court martial offenses is seen as incompatible with the responsibilities and ethical standards required of Limited Duty Officers (LDOs) and Chief Warrant Officers (CWOs).

In contrast, having a civil case pending, not being a U.S. citizen, or being a veteran may raise considerations or concerns during the evaluation process, but they do not automatically disqualify an applicant based solely on character assessment. A pending civil case might reflect ongoing legal issues but does not inherently indicate a lack of character. Not being a U.S. citizen does not pertain to character evaluation directly; it is a matter of eligibility. Being a veteran is generally viewed positively, as it reflects experience in military service, which can contribute to an applicant's qualifications.